You guys that are saying what he did was suspendable have really got to try and put yourself in the players shoes.
1) LILSIXER, he obviously wasn't arguing with the ref, he was complaining, or having a go at him, if the incident was that bad the referee should have given him a red card at the time, otherwise soccer will turn into AFL, where the ump says one thing and the tribuneral another. Lilsixer, i think u probably haven't played alot of competitive sport, the referees are butholes 50% of the time. especially when they speak a different language or barely speak english.
Australia wasn't given a fair go, Viduka was taken out of the game by the ref, because 'of his infringements', when he was doing the exact same things he has built his career on.
2) DMAN, not only viduka's, it's actually Kalac (??) and Popovic. Viduka knows a portion of their team.
3) tg10 thanks for clearing that up for them.
4) Stonecold, i'll eat my apple, and eat it with some dignity, i'm a proud Australian and i least i can say that i've supported Australia all of my life, through thick and thin, unlike you who converted to Germany at age 11.
21/06/2006
Those damn pipe dreams.